The Case For God: Why The Christian Worldview Make Sense by Pastor Dolapo Lawal: MP3 Download & Sermon Notes

The Only Worldview That Makes Sense

There is no religion like Christianity, and this is worth examining intellectually — not defensively, but as an open invitation to think carefully. 1 Peter 3:15 instructs believers to be ready to give a defense for their faith to those outside.

Every person operates from some worldview, whether consciously or not. There are five core categories every worldview must address:

• Theology — the nature and existence of God. Even the belief that there is no God is a theology.
• Anthropology — the nature of humanity
• Ethics — the foundation of morality
• Metaphysics — the nature of reality
• Epistemology — the nature and limits of knowledge

Christianity makes a specific and exclusive claim: it is not merely one path among many. The claim is that missing Christ is missing God entirely. It asserts exclusivity in its revelation of the Almighty — and this claim deserves serious engagement.

The Desensitization of Conscience

There is a growing trend of deliberately attacking and destabilizing people's beliefs through emotional manipulation — what is often called gaslighting. Many who publicly reject Christianity do so not from theological or logical objection, but from personal and relational pain. Like John the Baptist in prison, who had himself declared Jesus the Lamb of God but then sent disciples asking if Jesus was really the one — the issue was not theology. It was unmet expectation.

The answer is not to generalize and declare Christianity false. The honest response is to have the actual questions answered. Hurt pressed onto others in the form of theological dismissal helps no one.

It is also worth addressing the false claim that Christianity is a colonial or foreign religion. Historically:

• In Acts 2, Africans were present at Pentecost and heard the gospel
• The Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 was African
• Simon called Niger (meaning "black") in Acts 13 was a Black man involved in the early church
• Ethiopia — never colonized — is home to one of the oldest Christian churches in the world

Black people received the gospel before most European nations did.

Arguments Against God — and Why They Collapse

Atheism presents several major challenges to the existence of God. Each of them, examined carefully, does the opposite of what it intends.

1. The Problem of Evil

   The argument runs: if God is all-good and all-powerful, evil would not exist. Evil exists. Therefore, God does not exist.

   But this argument quietly assumes a massive premise — that evil is real, objective, and universally binding. That assumption is precisely where the argument collapses under its own weight.

   To call something evil, a fixed transcendent standard of good is required. Where does that standard come from? How does any person know that killing is evil? The knowledge of good and evil is intrinsic — which points inescapably to a Moral Lawgiver.

   Romans 1:18–20 explains this directly: what may be known of God is manifest in the human conscience. Since creation, God's invisible attributes have been clearly perceived through what has been made. This intrinsic moral knowledge exists in all people.

   On atheism, evil reduces to preference. There is no moral lawgiver, so what is called "evil" is simply personal reaction — cultural preference or evolutionary instinct. Neither is objective. The atheist who insists evil is real and objectively binding has, in that very moment, smuggled in the existence of a transcendent moral standard — and with it, a transcendent moral source.

   The existence of evil does not undermine the existence of God. It supports it.

   Consider what Christianity actually claims about suffering: every other worldview says death is the escape. Christianity says death is the fix. Believers are not here to escape evil but to confront and amend it — salt and light in the world. God did not observe evil from a distance. In Christ, he entered into it.

   In the Christian worldview, God faces the problem of justice and mercy simultaneously. Before humanity existed, Lucifer had already been judged and expelled from heaven. When humanity sinned, justice demanded a response — God could not be just toward Lucifer but overlook sin in humanity. What he did was pay the penalty himself. Every other worldview pardons sin. Christianity punishes it — in another. The Judge stepped down, gave the payment to the condemned, and returned to the bench. Discharged and acquitted — legally, not sentimentally.

   The emotional depth of the cross is often missed. The betrayal was by someone intimate. When Judas identified Jesus, he kissed him. A public pointing from a distance would have been painful. An intimate kiss showed the depth of the friendship that was violated. And the death that Judas's betrayal caused was the very sacrifice that could pay for Judas's sin.

   The existence of suffering is not evidence of God's absence. It is the arena in which God's redemptive purpose operates.

2. The Demand for Empirical Proof

   The claim that God is not real because he cannot be scientifically tested sounds rigorous. But the belief that only empirically verifiable things are real is itself a philosophical assumption — and it cannot be scientifically proven. This position has a name: scientism — the belief that only what can be scientifically verified is real or true.

   person

   Pastor Dolapo Lawal

   Enjoying this sermon? Browse more messages by Pastor Dolapo Lawal on Theology at ReadSermons.

   library_books More Sermons

   Scientism is itself a belief system. Atheism, in attacking belief, requires its own form of belief.

   Several problems with using science as the sole arbiter of reality:

   • Science explains only 5% of the universe. As of current knowledge, normal matter accounts for roughly 5% of the universe. The remaining 95% — dark matter and dark energy — remains largely unexplained. To say anything beyond scientific proof does not exist is to discount 95% of reality by science's own admission.
   • Scientific knowledge is provisional. It is always open to revision by new data. Something that is always being corrected is not absolute.
   • Science is a tool for measuring the physical world. Asking it to detect God is like using a metal detector to find love. The instrument was not designed for that purpose. The absence of a signal does not mean love does not exist — it means the wrong tool was used.

   Human beings have always operated through multiple modes of knowing:

   • Empirical — scientific observation and experiment
   • Rational — logic, mathematics, philosophy
   • Moral — conscience and ethical intuition
   • Relational — trust, testimony, love
   • Revelatory — scripture and religious experience

   Christianity does not reject evidence. It expands what counts as evidence.

   John 1:1 — "In the beginning was the Word" — uses the Greek logos, meaning the reasoning behind all things. The claim of John is that the answer to every question about reality, including creation itself, is found in God.

   Several converging lines of evidence point to a designer:

   • The fine-tuning of the universe
   • The existence of consciousness, pointing to a mind behind minds
   • The universal moral law, pointing to a moral lawgiver
   • The historical resurrection of Christ, supported by testimony, archaeology, and historical method

   You may also like

   

   God Will Meet You At The Point Of Your Need

   by Archbishop Benson Idahosa

   arrow_forward

   Believing the universe arranged itself from chaos requires enormous faith. Walking into a room and concluding that the chairs arranged themselves, the lights installed themselves, and the cameras appeared from nothing is not rational. Logic points to arrangement as evidence of an arranger. That is the heart of the Christian claim.

3. The Self-Existent or Accidental Universe

   When asked where the universe came from, there are only three possible answers:

   1. The universe created itself from nothing
   2. The universe has always existed eternally
   3. The universe was created by something beyond itself

   Atheism rejects option three. But options one and two are philosophically catastrophic.

   On option one: In the beginning there was nothing — and then nothing exploded and became something. This is logically incoherent on every level. Nothing has no properties, no potential, no capacity to act. Nothing cannot explode. An explosion requires matter, energy, and space — none of which exist in nothing. The Latin principle is foundational: ex nihilo nihil fit — nothing comes from nothing.

   When atheists invoke quantum mechanics to escape this, saying particles pop into existence from a quantum vacuum, they have not solved the problem. A quantum vacuum is not nothing. It is a sea of fluctuating energy operating within space, within time, and within physical laws. It is very much something. Invoking quantum fields, space, time, and the laws of physics merely pushes the question back one step and calls it an answer.

   On option two: The second law of thermodynamics rules out an eternally existing universe. Energy is constantly becoming less usable. Stars are burning out. Order moves toward disorder. If the universe were eternally old, it would have reached maximum entropy — total heat death — an infinite time ago. The fact that stars still burn means the universe cannot be infinitely old.

   Think of it like a phone battery. It starts at 100% and drains over time. It never naturally recharges itself. The universe's energy is always moving toward zero. This means the cosmic battery is still running — which means it had a beginning.

   Edwin Hubble's discovery — confirmed repeatedly — shows the universe is expanding in all directions. Run that expansion backward and everything converges to a single point of origin. A definite beginning. This is the foundation of what the Big Bang tells us.

   The BGV Theorem — named after physicists Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin — mathematically proves that any universe that has been expanding on average must have had an absolute beginning. Cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin, an atheist, acknowledged that cosmologists can no longer rely on a past-eternal universe as an escape. The universe had a beginning.

   The atheist wants to accuse the Christian of believing in something that came from nothing. Yet that is precisely what the atheist believes.

   The Christian believes in a God who is self-existent and eternal by nature — a being for whom the question "what caused you?" does not apply, because he exists outside time and causality. The atheist believes in a universe that shows every sign of having had a beginning — and claims it created itself.

   This is the Kalam Cosmological Argument:

   • Everything that begins to exist has a cause
   • The universe began to exist
   • Therefore, the universe has a cause

   What kind of cause could bring all space, time, matter, and energy into existence?

   • Spaceless — because it created space
   • Timeless — because it created time
   • Immaterial — because it created matter
   • Enormously powerful — because it created all energy
   • Personal — because it chose to create; an impersonal force has no mechanism for decision

   That description — spaceless, timeless, immaterial, all-powerful, and personal — is the definition of God.

   Only the God of the Bible fits that description. This is not a scientific discovery. It is a philosophical necessity.

A Call to Reason

This is not a call to abandon reason. It is a call to use it fully. The Christian worldview provides coherent, intellectually defensible answers to the hardest questions humanity faces.

For those inclined to share these arguments, the first and most important step is prayer. 2 Corinthians 4:4 teaches that the god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers to the light of the gospel. The blindness is spiritual before it is intellectual. Intercession opens what argument alone cannot.

Ephesians 1:17 — praying that God would give the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him, and that the eyes of understanding would be enlightened.